The issue of indecent and abusive language by politicians

Practice Questions on the Issue

QUESTION 01

Do you agree, the continued use of abusive language, including inflammatory, derogatory and misleading rhetoric, by politicians is a subversion of basic democratic moral values. Justify this statement with suitable examples. (10 Marks, 150 Words)

QUESTION 02

The indecency of political language can lead to voter apathy and disengagement, as a value-based society becomes disillusioned with personal attacks and negative political processes. Analyse this statement in the context of a sense of responsibility and personal satisfaction as a value-based citizen. (10 Marks, 150 words)

QUESTION 03

Abusive and indecent language by Political leaders, specially when amplified by social media, does not merely reflect a breakdown of civility but actively harms democratic values. The damage includes a decline in public trust, increased polarization, and the chilling effect on political engagement, ultimately weakening democratic governance. Examine the above statement with suitable illustrations. (10 Marks, 150 Words)

CASE STUDY

(Understanding Ethical Dilemmas & Ethical Frameworks)

In the weeks leading up to a crucial state assembly election in India, the political landscape is intensely polarized. Two prominent political leaders, representing opposing parties, have been engaging in a series of heated exchanges.

The exchanges began with Leader ‘A’ making inflammatory statements at a public rally, accusing Leader B’s party of being “anti-national” and “soft on terror”. In retaliation, one of the politician of the political Leader B’s party, during a press conference, used derogatory and abusive language to personally attack Leader A and his family, which is widely circulated on social media platforms. The online content, amplified by party-affiliated “IT cells,” includes fabricated stories and character assassination, further intensifying public outrage and communal tensions.

The traditional news media is divided. Some channels provide extensive airtime to the political mudslinging, framing it as a major election issue. Other outlets, worried about declining ratings and political pressure, downplay the abusive content or frame it as a “he said, she said” issue. Meanwhile, civil society organizations and legal experts raise concerns about the normalization of abusive political discourse and its potential to incite violence and undermine democratic values.

QUESTION 01

Discuss the ethical issues involved in the case.

QUESTION 02

What ethical dilemmas are arising in this case?

QUESTION 03

Critically examine ethical frameworks to evaluate and resolve ethical issues involved in the case.